Why do firms disclose performance compensation targets ?
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper analyzes the decision to disclose performance compensation targets that contain information about future profitability. I test the effect of factors expected to influence the decision to provide other expectation disclosures, e.g. management forecasts, as well as that of factors particular to the compensation setting. Results suggest that financial reporting concerns (as measured in Carter et al., 2007) along with pressure from the SEC influence performance target disclosure, and that the influence changes with the availability of management forecasts. I further test determinants of the level of performance target relative to a management forecast. I show institutional ownership is associated with higher performance targets relative to forecasts, while neither excess compensation, SEC pressure, nor financial reporting incentives appear to influence this difference. Thesis Supervisor: John E. Core Title: Nanyang Technological University Professor of Accounting
منابع مشابه
Non-GAAP Earnings for Contracting and Financial Disclosure
We explore how the internal use of non-GAAP performance metrics in compensation contracting relates to the disclosure of non-GAAP earnings to external stakeholders. Ex ante, it is unclear why information useful in contracting would be informative for valuation purposes unless a firm’s compensation and financial disclosure processes are related. We explore this relation using a large hand-collec...
متن کاملCompetition and the Impact of Mandatory Disclosure Laws∗
There are many laws which require sellers to disclose private information about the quality of their products. But the theoretical justification for these laws is not obvious: economic theory predicts that a seller will voluntarily disclose such quality information, however unfavorable, as long as it is costless to do so. Here we show that competitive pressures between firms may undermine this ...
متن کاملEBITDA and Overinvestment in Capital
EBITDA is a commonly used performance measure for (1) valuation, (2) debt contracting, and (3) executive compensation. The widespread use of EBITDA by stakeholders may induce managers to focus EBITDA as well. Since EBITDA excludes various expenses, managers who focus on EBITDA may underweight those costs when investing in capital and choosing leverage levels. I proxy for managers’ focus on EBIT...
متن کاملWhy do firms adopt CEO stock options ? Evidence from the United States
This paper examines the determinants of stock option introduction as a part of CEO compensation in listed US firms during the 1994-2004 period. The results are consistent with agency costs and recruiting considerations, suggesting that firms do not adjust CEO compensation in order to address the ‘investment horizon’ problem. The findings also suggest that CEO stock option adoption is not necess...
متن کاملDoes Transparency Increase Executive Compensation ? ∗
I study the impact of changes in compensation disclosure on the level and structure of executive compensation. I exploit exogenous variation of compensation information among executives after a corporate governance reform in Germany in the late 2000s. The reform, for the first time in Germany, required firms to publicly disclose the individual compensation packages of key executives. Prior to t...
متن کامل